Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison filed an opposition to X.AI's motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to block enforcement of Minnesota's anti-nudification law, which bans commercial platforms from allowing users to generate synthetic intimate images of real people. The court previously denied X.AI's motion for a temporary restraining order, and the law took effect August 1, 2026. The AG argues X.AI cannot show irreparable harm and is unlikely to prevail on the merits of its First Amendment claims.
The state seeks to uphold Minnesota's anti-nudification law, which bans commercial platforms from providing tools that allow users to generate synthetic intimate images of real people. The law imposes penalties on violating platforms. No monetary penalty has been assessed in this action; the state is defending the law against X.AI's constitutional challenge and opposing X.AI's motion for a preliminary injunction.
In-house legal teams should review their acceptable use policies and terms of service for AI-powered platforms, particularly any that allow users to upload or generate images of people. Key clauses to review include: (1) acceptable use provisions prohibiting the creation of non-consensual intimate imagery, (2) content moderation and takedown procedures, (3) indemnification clauses covering user-generated content that violates state laws, (4) AI training data provisions that may include likeness data, and (5) compliance certifications for state-specific laws like Minnesota's anti-nudification statute. Vendor agreements with AI service providers should include representations and warranties that their tools comply with applicable state laws regarding synthetic media and deepfakes.
Entity
X.AI
Industry
Technology"X.AI"
"AG Ellison argues X.AI cannot show 'irreparable harm' necessary for preliminary injunction to be granted"
"In 2026, the Minnesota Legislature overwhelmingly passed a law that bans commercial products — a "website, application, software, program" or other service — from allowing users to take a real person's likeness and synthetically generate images of their intimate parts"
"August 18, 2026"
The Minnesota court denied X.AI's request for a temporary restraining order that would have halted enforcement of Minnesota's first-in-the-nation AI nudification ban (HF 1606). The law bans technology that generates fake nude images of real people, and Attorney General Ellison argued that X.AI's delay in filing the motion showed no immediate harm. The court agreed, allowing the law to take effect as planned.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison issued a consumer alert explaining how veterans, their families, and others who believe Trajector Holdings owes them money can file claims in the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The release announces no privacy violation, enforcement penalty, or remedy against the company.
Minnesota and 39 other attorneys general filed a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds, including children’s private chatbot conversations. The states seek protections for consumers in any sale or transfer of the business or assets; the filing does not impose a penalty or establish a final remedy.
The Minnesota Attorney General filed an Assurance of Discontinuance requiring Auto Tech Donations, Inc. to dissolve after finding that its solicitations and governance did not comply with state requirements. Its president was banned from forming or serving as an officer or director of nonprofits and must provide restitution to donors whose vehicles he resold for personal benefit.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and a coalition of 26 states, counties, and cities filed a lawsuit challenging NHTSA’s rule weakening fuel-economy standards for new cars and light trucks. The coalition alleges the rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act; the press release describes a lawsuit filing, not a monetary penalty or final judgment.
$35.0M
Minnesota, the FTC, and a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general reached a proposed settlement with Corteva over alleged loyalty programs that restricted pesticide distributors from buying lower-cost generic products. Corteva must end the challenged practices, comply with restrictions for 10 years, and pay $35 million to the state plaintiffs, including $1.25 million to Minnesota.