New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow Risk

Court denies X.AI's attempt to block Minnesota's AI nudification ban

Summary

The Minnesota court denied X.AI's request for a temporary restraining order that would have halted enforcement of Minnesota's first-in-the-nation AI nudification ban (HF 1606). The law bans technology that generates fake nude images of real people, and Attorney General Ellison argued that X.AI's delay in filing the motion showed no immediate harm. The court agreed, allowing the law to take effect as planned.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements related to AI image generation tools, ensuring clauses explicitly prohibit generating non-consensual intimate images and require compliance with state laws like Minnesota's HF 1606. Data processing agreements should address training data that may include minors, and content moderation obligations should be clearly defined. Customer-facing terms of service should include prohibitions on using the service to create deepfake nude images, and indemnification clauses should cover violations of such laws.

Contract Search Terms

AI nudificationnon-consensual intimate imageschild sexual abuse materialGrok ImagineAI-generated contentdeepfake consent clauseAI training datacontent moderationMinnesota HF 1606synthetic media policy

Laws Cited

HF 1606

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

X.AI

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"X.AI"
Laws Cited
"HF 1606"
Violation Types
"bans the use of technology that generates fake nude images of real people"
Violation Types
"staggering amount child sexual abuse material that AI products like Grok Imagine generate"
Event Date
"July 31, 2026"

Related Enforcement Actions

MN

X.AI

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison filed an opposition to X.AI's motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to block enforcement of Minnesota's anti-nudification law, which bans commercial platforms from allowing users to generate synthetic intimate images of real people. The court previously denied X.AI's motion for a temporary restraining order, and the law took effect August 1, 2026. The AG argues X.AI cannot show irreparable harm and is unlikely to prevail on the merits of its First Amendment claims.

MN

Trajector Holdings, LLC

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison issued a consumer alert explaining how veterans, their families, and others who believe Trajector Holdings owes them money can file claims in the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The release announces no privacy violation, enforcement penalty, or remedy against the company.

MN

Character Technologies, Inc.

Minnesota and 39 other attorneys general filed a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds, including children’s private chatbot conversations. The states seek protections for consumers in any sale or transfer of the business or assets; the filing does not impose a penalty or establish a final remedy.

MN

Auto Tech Donations, Inc.

The Minnesota Attorney General filed an Assurance of Discontinuance requiring Auto Tech Donations, Inc. to dissolve after finding that its solicitations and governance did not comply with state requirements. Its president was banned from forming or serving as an officer or director of nonprofits and must provide restitution to donors whose vehicles he resold for personal benefit.

MN

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and a coalition of 26 states, counties, and cities filed a lawsuit challenging NHTSA’s rule weakening fuel-economy standards for new cars and light trucks. The coalition alleges the rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act; the press release describes a lawsuit filing, not a monetary penalty or final judgment.

MN

Corteva Inc.

$35.0M

Minnesota, the FTC, and a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general reached a proposed settlement with Corteva over alleged loyalty programs that restricted pesticide distributors from buying lower-cost generic products. Corteva must end the challenged practices, comply with restrictions for 10 years, and pay $35 million to the state plaintiffs, including $1.25 million to Minnesota.