New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementLow Risk

FTC Settles with Stormy Wellington Over Deceptive MLM Earnings Claims

Stormy WellingtonApril 13, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC settled allegations against Stormy Wellington, a high-level multilevel marketing (MLM) participant, for using false and unsubstantiated earnings claims to recruit new members for Total Life Changes and Farmasi MLMs. The stipulated final order prohibits Wellington from making deceptive earnings representations, requires written substantiation of all earnings claims, and mandates notification to her downline participants about the order’s prohibitions. No monetary penalty was imposed.

Remedy

The stipulated order prohibits Wellington from misrepresenting potential or actual participant earnings, reasons for lack of compensation, or other material facts about MLM business ventures, including via images of luxury purchases or travel. She must substantiate all earnings claims with written evidence and provide such evidence to interested potential participants upon request. Additionally, she is required to notify all her downline MLM participants about the order’s prohibitions on deceptive earnings claims.

Consent DecreeInjunctionCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams at MLM companies, direct selling firms, or businesses using independent contractors for recruitment should review participant, influencer, and recruitment vendor agreements to prohibit deceptive or unsubstantiated earnings claims. Clauses governing income representations must require written substantiation of all earnings claims, limit statements to actual participant earnings data, and ban misleading implications of guaranteed income. Teams should also add clauses requiring participants to notify their downline of compliance orders, align agreements with mandatory income disclosure requirements, and include indemnification for deceptive earnings claims made by contractors. Marketing and advertising agreements with high-level recruiters should explicitly ban false earnings promises and require retention of substantiation records.

Contract Search Terms

earnings claimsincome disclosure statementsubstantiation of earningsdeceptive recruitment representationsMLM participant agreementmaterial fact misrepresentationdownline notification requirementsearnings representation clause

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Stormy Wellington

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Stormy Wellington"
Event Date
"April 13, 2026"
Summary
"used false or baseless earning claims to recruit workers, most of whom did not earn any money from the venture."
Remedy Summary
"Wellington will be prohibited from misrepresenting or assisting others in misrepresenting how much money others can earn from various business ventures."

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.

FTC

24 healthcare services companies (not individually named)

The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.

FTC

Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC

$1.9M

The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.