New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementLow Risk

FTC Settlement with Greenway Auto Group over Deceptive Vehicle Pricing

Greenway Auto GroupOctober 8, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.

Remedy

The proposed stipulated order requires vehicle advertisements to prominently disclose the actual price consumers must pay, subject only to government-required charges, and prohibits deceptive prize mailers and specified misrepresentations about fees, optional or required products or services, and financing.

InjunctionConsent Decree

Contract Impact

Review agreements with advertising agencies, lead-generation providers, direct-mail vendors, and other marketing partners for clear responsibility to substantiate advertised prices and prize claims, disclose mandatory fees and eligibility conditions, and obtain approval before publishing pricing or financing representations. Review customer-facing sales terms and promotional materials to ensure they distinguish government-required charges from other fees, accurately describe optional products and services, and state rebate or financing conditions. This action concerns advertising and consumer protection, not privacy practices, so it does not itself indicate a need to revise data-processing, privacy-policy, employee, or breach-notification clauses.

Contract Search Terms

advertised price substantiationmandatory fee disclosureoptional versus required chargesconditional rebate eligibilityfinancing representation approvalprice transparency requirementspromotional prize claim substantiationadvertising compliance review

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Greenway Auto Group

Industry

Automotive

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Greenway Auto Group"
Violation Types
"Complaint alleges Greenway Auto Group deceived consumers by advertising prices thousands of dollars below actual prices and sending false prize mailers"
Remedy Summary
"the proposed order prohibits specific misrepresentations, including whether charges, fees, taxes, products or services are optional or required and whether any type of or source for financing is required."
Event Date
"October 8, 2026"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

24 healthcare services companies (not individually named)

The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.

FTC

Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC

$1.9M

The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.

FTC

Online platforms

The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.