The FTC filed a complaint and obtained a temporary restraining order against six defendants operating a deceptive health care scheme that impersonated government and insurance carriers to sell fake comprehensive health plans. The defendants allegedly charged consumers without express informed consent, failed to disclose material terms including cancellation processes, and misled consumers into paying for inadequate coverage that left many with substantial medical debt. The FTC seeks refunds for affected consumers and alleges violations of the FTC Act, Telemarketing Sales Rule, Impersonation Rule, and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued a temporary restraining order halting the defendants' deceptive operations. The FTC's complaint seeks refunds for consumers harmed by the scheme, and requests injunctive relief to permanently stop the unlawful practices.
In-house legal teams should review customer agreements, vendor contracts with telemarketing service providers, and insurance-related service agreements. Key clauses to audit include consent provisions to ensure express, informed consent for all charges (especially recurring payments), negative option and automatic renewal clauses requiring clear disclosure of cancellation steps, material terms disclosure sections, telemarketing compliance representations and warranties, and data protection clauses for health and financial consumer information. Agreements should also prohibit impersonation of government entities or third-party carriers, and include breach notification requirements for unauthorized use of consumer data.
Entity
Innovative Partners, LP; American Collective, LP; Papyrus Green Investments LLC; Health Plan Administrators, LLC; Amani Ibrahim Shokry; Ahmed Ibrihim Shokry
Industry
InsuranceOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/04/ftc-sues-stop-deceptive-health-care-scheme
2423043innovativepartnerstro
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2423043innovativepartnerstro.pdf
2423043innovativepartnerscomplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2423043innovativepartnerscomplaint.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"April 22, 2026"
"The defendants include Innovative Partners, LP, which does business as Innovative Health Plan or Healthcare Plan, and its Chief Technology Officer Amani Ibrahim Shokry; American Collective, LP, which does business as ACLP Health Plan; Papyrus Green Investments LLC; and their owner Ahmed Ibrihim Shokry, as well as Health Plan Administrators, LLC."
"the defendants violated the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, the Impersonation Rule, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act"
"unfairly charge consumers without their express, informed consent"
"fail to disclose material terms and conditions of their negative option feature, specifically the steps consumers must take to cancel the monthly recurring payments"
"the court entered a temporary restraining order against the defendants"
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.
The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.
$1.9M
The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.