The FTC filed a complaint against Iconic Hearts Holdings, Inc., operator of the Sendit anonymous messaging app, for unlawfully collecting personal data from children in violation of COPPA, misleading users by sending messages from fake personas, and tricking consumers into paid subscriptions by falsely promising to reveal anonymous senders.
The FTC seeks a permanent injunction and monetary penalties against Iconic Hearts Holdings, Inc. and its CEO, Hunter Rice.
In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing agreements (Terms of Service, Privacy Policies) and vendor/data processing agreements for the Sendit app or similar services. Specifically examine clauses governing data collection from minors (requiring verifiable parental consent under COPPA), disclosures about automated or fake sender personas, subscription and payment terms (including auto-renewal, cancellation, and clear pricing), and data retention/deletion policies for children's personal information. Required changes likely include implementing robust age-screening and parental consent workflows, explicitly disclosing that messages may originate from non-human or fake accounts, ensuring subscription terms are transparent with easy cancellation, and establishing strict data retention limits for users identified as under 13.
Entity
Iconic Hearts Holdings, Inc.
Also known as: Iconic Hearts Holdings
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/232-3029-iconic-hearts-holdings-inc-us-v
IconicHeartsComplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/IconicHeartsComplaint.pdf
ftc alleges sendit app its ceo unlawfully collected personal
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/09/ftc-alleges-sendit-app-its-ceo-unlawfully-collected-personal-data-children-deceived-users-about
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"ICONIC HEARTS HOLDINGS, INC."
"Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)"
"unlawfully collecting personal data from children"
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.
The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.
$1.9M
The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.