Penalty Amount
$48,597,538
Consumer fraud case where the FTC settled with Growth Cave defendants for operating a deceptive business opportunity and credit repair scheme that cost consumers nearly $50 million. The settlement permanently bans them from such activities, requires asset liquidation to pay a $48.6 million judgment, and prohibits misleading earnings claims and AI use.
The settlement includes permanent bans on marketing business opportunities and credit repair programs, prohibitions on misleading earnings claims and AI use, a $48.6 million judgment partially satisfied through asset liquidation (including a house and luxury vehicles), and funds directed for consumer redress.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor, customer, and partnership agreements where the company sells or markets business opportunities, credit repair services, or any income-generating programs. Specifically scrutinize clauses governing earnings representations, marketing and advertising commitments, use of AI in customer communications or content creation, and dispute resolution/judgment enforcement provisions. Given the permanent ban and $48.6 million judgment, contracts may need amendments to include explicit disclaimers about earnings potential, prohibit the use of AI for deceptive claims, and incorporate compliance mechanisms aligned with the settlement's prohibitions against misleading conduct. Asset liquidation terms in any related settlement or payment plans should also be assessed for enforceability.
Entity
Growth Cave, LLC
Also known as: Growth Cave
Industry
Financial ServicesOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/01/ftc-secures-settlement-banning-growth-cave-defendants-marketing-selling-business-opportunities
GrowthCave FinalOrder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/GrowthCave-FinalOrder.pdf
Batte FinalOrder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Batte-FinalOrder.pdf
StipOrder Marksberry
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/StipOrder-Marksberry.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Growth Cave"
"$48,597,538"
"deceptive business opportunity, credit repair scheme"
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.
The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.
$1.9M
The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.