New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeLow Risk

FTC Orders GoDaddy to Overhaul Data Security After Misleading Claims

GoDaddyMay 21, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC finalized an order with GoDaddy for failing to implement adequate data security measures and misleading consumers about its security and Privacy Shield compliance. The order prohibits misrepresentations, requires a comprehensive security program, and mandates independent assessments.

Remedy

GoDaddy must stop making false security claims, establish and implement a comprehensive information-security program, and hire an independent third-party assessor to review the program.

InjunctionCompliance ProgramAudit Requirement

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor, customer, and data processing agreements where GoDaddy acts as a service provider. Focus on clauses related to data security obligations, representations/warranties about security measures and compliance certifications (especially Privacy Shield), audit and assessment rights, and breach notification requirements. Contracts may need amendments to: (1) remove or qualify any broad security claims or references to specific certifications like Privacy Shield; (2) incorporate specific, actionable security requirements aligned with the order's mandate for a comprehensive program (e.g., MFA, threat monitoring); (3) grant the company rights to conduct or require independent security assessments; and (4) ensure breach notification terms are robust and consistent with the order's expectations.

Contract Search Terms

data security programmisrepresentation clausePrivacy Shield certificationindependent security assessormulti-factor authentication requirementbreach notificationaudit rightscustomer data protectionsecurity representationscompliance with government-sponsored programs

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

GoDaddy

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"GoDaddy"
Violation Types
"misled consumers by failing to implement data security protections, which led to several data breaches."

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.

FTC

24 healthcare services companies (not individually named)

The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.

FTC

Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC

$1.9M

The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.