New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementCritical RiskMultistate

IM Mastery Academy MLM Scheme Settles FTC and Nevada Charges Over Deceptive Earnings Claims

Chris Terry, Isis Terry, IM Mastery Academy, IYOVIA, iMarketsLive, IM AcademyMay 13, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$795,800,000

Summary

The FTC and State of Nevada settled charges with lead defendants of the IM Mastery Academy MLM scheme, including Chris and Isis Terry and their affiliated companies, over false earnings claims used to promote financial training programs and a multi-level marketing venture. The stipulated order imposes a $795.8 million judgment, with defendants surrendering nearly $90 million in assets including luxury real estate, vehicles, jewelry, and a yacht, totaling over $100 million with prior judgments from other involved defendants. The order also bans defendants from selling trading-training services, prohibits false earnings claims, and restricts deceptive practices including negative-option misrepresentations and telemarketing violations.

Remedy

The stipulated order imposes a $795.8 million judgment, partially satisfied by surrender of nearly $90 million in assets including luxury homes, vehicles, jewelry, and a yacht, with total payments from all defendants exceeding $100 million. Defendants are permanently banned from selling trading-training services and investment opportunities, prohibited from making false or unsubstantiated earnings claims, and barred from deceptive misrepresentations regarding goods/services, refunds, and negative-option features. Defendants must obtain express informed consent and provide simple cancellation mechanisms for negative-option sales, and are prohibited from violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule. The remaining judgment is suspended pending truthful financial disclosures, with full amount due if defendants misrepresent their finances.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent DecreeBan

Contract Impact

In-house teams should review all vendor agreements with marketing firms, MLM service providers, and financial training vendors for clauses related to earnings claims, ensuring all representations have reasonable basis and prohibiting false or baseless statements. Contracts involving negative-option features (e.g., subscription services) must include express informed consent requirements, simple cancellation mechanisms, and clear refund/cancellation policy disclosures. Telemarketing service provider agreements should require strict compliance with the Telemarketing Sales Rule, and MLM distributor agreements must ban false earnings claims, misrepresentations about consumer experience requirements, and undisclosed product restrictions. All customer-facing agreements should include clauses prohibiting deceptive misrepresentations and mandating required disclosures for negative-option sales.

Contract Search Terms

earnings claimsnegative option featureexpress informed consentcancellation mechanismtelemarketing compliancerefund policy disclosuresmisrepresentation clausefinancial training services

Laws Cited

FTC Act Section 5Telemarketing Sales Rule (16 CFR Part 310)
15 U.S.C. 4516 CFR Part 310

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Chris Terry, Isis Terry, IM Mastery Academy, IYOVIA, iMarketsLive, IM Academy

Industry

Financial Services

Multistate Coalition

State of Nevada

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Chris and Isis Terry and their companies"
Entity Name
"five individual and corporate IM Mastery Academy defendants, including ringleaders Chris and Isis Terry"
Fine Amount
"imposes a $795.8 million judgment"
Fine Amount
"surrender assets valued at nearly $90 million"
Laws Cited
"bars the defendants from violating the Commission’s Telemarketing Sales Rule"
Summary
"used false or baseless earnings claims to persuade people to pay for financial training programs and a multi-level-marketing business venture"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.

FTC

24 healthcare services companies (not individually named)

The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.

FTC

Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC

$1.9M

The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.