New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh Risk

FTC Penalizes Cerebral $7M for Health Data Sharing and Deceptive Practices

Cerebral, Inc.April 15, 2024Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$7,000,000

Consumers Affected

3,200,000

Summary

The FTC settled with telehealth firm Cerebral, Inc. for sharing sensitive consumer mental health data with third parties like LinkedIn, Snapchat, and TikTok for advertising without proper consent, employing sloppy security practices, and misleading consumers about cancellation policies. Cerebral must pay over $7 million (with $2 million due upfront), is permanently banned from using health information for most advertising, must implement a comprehensive privacy program, delete unnecessary data, and provide easy cancellation.

Remedy

Cerebral must pay $7 million total ($5.1 million for consumer refunds and a $10 million suspended civil penalty after a $2 million payment). The company is permanently banned from using or disclosing personal and health information for most marketing/advertising without consent, must implement a comprehensive privacy and data security program, delete most consumer data not needed for treatment/payment/operations, provide an easy cancellation mechanism, post a corrective notice on its website, and face ongoing monitoring and reporting requirements.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent DecreeAudit RequirementCompliance ProgramData DeletionConsumer RefundsReporting RequirementsCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor agreements where Cerebral shares data with third parties (e.g., LinkedIn, Snapchat, TikTok) for advertising, focusing on data sharing clauses and consent requirements. Customer agreements, including terms of service and privacy policies, must be examined for provisions on health data usage, advertising consent, cancellation policies, and data security standards. Data processing agreements should be checked for compliance with health data protection. Required changes include adding explicit opt-in consent for using health information in advertising, prohibiting such use entirely per the order, enhancing security measures, ensuring easy cancellation processes, and updating data retention and breach notification clauses to align with the settlement.

Contract Search Terms

health data sharing consentadvertising consent mechanismthird-party data sharingcancellation policy claritydata security practicessensitive health informationtelehealth data protectionconsumer deceptiondata retention schedulebreach notification clause

Laws Cited

FTC Act Section 5Opioid Addiction Recovery Fraud Prevention Act of 2018 (OARFPA)Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA)

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Cerebral, Inc.

Also known as: Cerebral

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Cerebral, Inc. has agreed to an order"
Fine Amount
"require it to pay $7 million"
Fine Amount
"pay more than $7 million"
Violation Types
"disclosed consumers’ sensitive personal health information and other sensitive data to third parties for advertising purposes"
Violation Types
"failed to deploy adequate safeguards for the sensitive data collected from consumers and engaged in sloppy security practices"
Violation Types
"failed to clearly disclose all material terms of Cerebral’s cancellation policies before charging consumers"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.

FTC

24 healthcare services companies (not individually named)

The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.

FTC

Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC

$1.9M

The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.