The FTC removed Aristotle International, Inc. from its list of approved COPPA Safe Harbor programs due to insufficient monitoring of member companies' compliance with COPPA guidelines. This action prevents operators from using Aristotle's program for favorable regulatory treatment and marks the first such removal since COPPA's inception.
Aristotle was banned from the FTC's COPPA Safe Harbor program, meaning it can no longer certify companies for compliance and operators lose the benefits of its oversight.
In-house legal teams should review all vendor and customer agreements where a party represents compliance with children's privacy laws through an FTC-approved Safe Harbor program, particularly those referencing Aristotle International or similar self-regulatory organizations. Specific clauses to scrutinize include: (1) representations and warranties regarding COPPA compliance and Safe Harbor participation; (2) monitoring, audit, and enforcement obligations of the self-regulatory organization; (3) termination rights triggered if a Safe Harbor program loses FTC approval; and (4) indemnification provisions related to privacy violations. Agreements may need amendments to require alternative compliance methods (e.g., direct adherence to COPPA) and to add notification obligations if a designated Safe Harbor program is delisted. Employee agreements involving data handling of children's information should also be assessed for alignment with direct COPPA requirements.
Entity
Aristotle International, Inc.
Also known as: Aristotle
Industry
OtherOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/08/aristotle-removed-list-ftc-approved-childrens-privacy-self-regulatory-programs
safe harbor program
https://www.ftc.gov/safe-harbor-program
ftc approves safe harbor program aristotle international inc
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2012/02/ftc-approves-safe-harbor-program-aristotle-international-inc
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Aristotle International, Inc. (Aristotle)"
"Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)"
"COPPA Rule"
"may not have sufficiently monitored its member companies to ensure they were complying with its guidelines, as required by the COPPA Rule."
The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.
The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.
The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.
The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.
$1.9M
The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.