New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow Risk

FTC Sues Amare Global Holdings for Misrepresenting Health Benefits of Dietary Supplements

Amare Global Holdings Inc.June 2, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Summary

The FTC sued Amare Global Holdings Inc. and its principals for falsely claiming that dietary supplements like Kids Happy Juice and Kids Mood+ could treat or cure depression, anxiety, and ADHD in children and adults. The FTC also alleged the company misled recruits about their potential earnings as 'brand partners' in its multilevel marketing scheme.

Remedy

The FTC seeks to stop the defendants from making false, misleading, and unsubstantiated health claims and deceptive earnings claims, and to require corrective actions.

InjunctionCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house teams should review vendor, influencer, and brand partner agreements for clauses related to health claims substantiation, earnings representations, and compliance with FTC orders. Ensure contracts require distributors and affiliates to have competent and reliable scientific evidence before making product claims, and include indemnification for deceptive marketing. Also review supplier and manufacturing agreements for quality control and substantiation obligations.

Contract Search Terms

health claims substantiationdietary supplement marketingearnings claimsmultilevel marketing agreementbrand partner agreementscientific substantiation clauseprior FTC order compliancetestimonial disclosureinfluencer contractincome representations

Laws Cited

15 U.S.C. §45

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Amare Global Holdings Inc.

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Amare Global Holdings Inc."
Laws Cited
"violated the FTC Act"
Violation Types
"false, misleading and unsubstantiated claims"
Violation Types
"deceptive earnings claims"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.

FTC

24 healthcare services companies (not individually named)

The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.

FTC

Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC

$1.9M

The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.