New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeLow Risk

FTC Orders 1Health.io to Pay $75K for Genetic Data Security and Deception

1Health.ioSeptember 7, 2023Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$75,000

Summary

The FTC finalized an order against 1Health.io for failing to secure genetic data and unfairly changing its privacy policy. The company must pay $75,000 for consumer refunds, destroy DNA samples, and implement security measures. It deceived consumers about data deletion and shared data without proper consent.

Remedy

1Health.io must pay $75,000 for consumer refunds, instruct third-party laboratories to destroy all consumer DNA samples retained for more than 180 days, prohibit sharing health data without affirmative express consent, notify the FTC about unauthorized disclosures, and implement a comprehensive information security program.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsData DeletionInjunctionReporting RequirementsCompliance Program

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all vendor and customer agreements, particularly those involving the processing of genetic, health, or biometric data. Focus on clauses governing data security standards (e.g., encryption requirements), privacy policy change mechanisms (including notice and consent provisions), data deletion and destruction obligations, and limitations on data sharing. Given the findings of deceptive practices and inadequate security, contracts must be amended to include explicit, opt-in consent for any retroactive privacy policy changes, mandate specific technical safeguards for sensitive genetic data (like encryption at rest and in transit), and enforce strict, time-bound protocols for the complete destruction of DNA samples and associated data upon request or after analysis. Additionally, ensure data processing addendums for genetic data incorporate these heightened standards and provide clear audit rights.

Contract Search Terms

genetic data security clauseprivacy policy amendment consentdata deletion guaranteeDNA sample destruction protocolretroactive policy change prohibitionsensitive health data sharing consentunencrypted data storage prohibitionconsumer data access and deletion rightssecurity incident notification requirementdata processing addendum for genetic information

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

1Health.io

Also known as: 1Health

Industry

Healthcare

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"1Health.io"
Fine Amount
"must pay $75,000"
Violation Types
"charges that the genetic testing firm left sensitive genetic and health data unsecured, deceived consumers about their ability to get their data deleted, and changed its privacy policy retroactively without adequately notifying consumers and obtaining their consent."

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

1Health.io

$50K

The FTC settled with genetic testing company 1Health.io for failing to secure sensitive genetic and health data, deceiving consumers about data deletion, and unfairly changing its privacy policy without notice or consent. The settlement includes refunds totaling over $49,500 to 2,432 affected consumers.

FTC

REPS & Company Inc.

The FTC referred a complaint against REPS & Company Inc. and company executives, alleging they bypassed ticket-issuer security controls and purchasing limits to acquire millions of tickets for resale. The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice, and the case will be decided by the court; the press release does not report a penalty or other remedy imposed.

FTC

Digital Forensics Corporation LLC

The FTC sued Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and affiliated defendants, alleging they misled sextortion victims with promises of investigative and monitoring services that often were not provided, and used fake positive reviews. A federal court granted the FTC’s request to temporarily halt the defendants’ activities; the complaint remains for the court to decide.

FTC

Greenway Auto Group

The FTC alleged that Greenway Auto Group advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below the amounts consumers actually paid and used mailers falsely suggesting recipients had won cash prizes. Greenway agreed to an order requiring transparent pricing and prohibiting deceptive prize mailers and other misrepresentations; the press release does not state a monetary penalty.

FTC

24 healthcare services companies (not individually named)

The FTC sent warning letters to 24 large healthcare services companies, cautioning that incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely pricing information for scheduled medical care may be unfair or deceptive. The letters urge recipients to review their price-disclosure practices and take corrective action; they announce no fine or formal order.

FTC

Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC

$1.9M

The FTC alleged that Premier Franchising Group LLC and Franchise Fastlane LLC made deceptive and unsubstantiated claims about the Premier Martial Arts franchise opportunity and violated the Franchise Rule. The proposed settlements require the companies to pay a combined $1.85 million to compensate franchisees, prohibit certain misrepresentations, and require Franchise Rule compliance; certain franchisees may also cancel their agreements without penalty.