New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

CT AG and FTC Sue Zillow, Redfin Over $100M Anticompetitive Rental Market Agreement

Zillow and RedfinOctober 1, 2025Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, along with attorneys general from Arizona, New York, Virginia, Washington, and the FTC, sued Zillow and Redfin for an anticompetitive agreement where Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to exit the multifamily rental listing market. The complaint alleges violations of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act, claiming the agreement reduces competition and could lead to higher rents.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review contracts for antitrust risks, including exclusive dealing arrangements, non-compete clauses, market division agreements, and any provisions that could restrict competition. Specifically, check for agreements where one party pays another to exit a market or become an exclusive provider, as such practices may violate Sherman Act Section 1 and Clayton Act Section 7.

Contract Search Terms

exclusive agreementnon-competemarket allocationantitrust complianceexclusive dealingreferral agreementcompetition lawSherman ActClayton Actmonopolization

Laws Cited

Sherman ActClayton Act
15 U.S.C. § 115 U.S.C. § 18

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Zillow and Redfin

Also known as: Zillow; Redfin

Industry

Real Estate

Multistate Coalition

Arizona AGNew York AGVirginia AGWashington AGFTC

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Zillow and Redfin"
Laws Cited
"Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1"
Laws Cited
"Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18"
Summary
"Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to exit the ILS market for multifamily properties."

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

$625K

Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.

CT

Boston Children’s Health Physicians and XTIUM

$2.6M

Connecticut and New York found that Boston Children’s Health Physicians and its security vendor, XTIUM, failed to use reasonable safeguards, resulting in hackers accessing sensitive personal, medical, and employee information. The companies agreed to pay penalties totaling $2.64 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.

CT

Character Technologies, Inc.

Connecticut joined a coalition of state attorneys general filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds. The states seek protections for children and consumers if the company’s business or assets are sold or transferred; the filing does not impose a fine or other remedy.

CT

Connecticut public utilities

Attorney General William Tong and Consumer Counsel Claire Coleman petitioned PURA to review how Connecticut public utilities use artificial intelligence, citing potential data privacy and cybersecurity risks, algorithmic errors, and misleading outputs. The petition asks PURA to examine utility AI systems, safeguards, vendors, and data security practices; it does not report a finding of violation or an imposed penalty.

CT

RZ Smoke, Inc.

$2.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a settlement with RZ Smoke, Inc. over allegations that it distributed and sold high-potency cannabis products without a state license. The stipulated judgment is $2 million, with $375,000 payable to the State and $1.6 million suspended to ensure compliance; the company is barred from specified cannabis activities in Connecticut unless licensed.

CT

Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc.

$13.7M

Connecticut joined a coalition of states and the federal government in settling allegations that Takeda paid healthcare providers speaker honoraria and provided meals to induce prescriptions of Trintellix, leading to allegedly false claims to government healthcare programs. Takeda agreed to pay $13,670,921 plus accrued interest, with portions allocated to federal and state programs.