Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, along with the FTC and 21 other states and counties, filed a lawsuit against Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC for deceptive practices related to their Uber One subscription service. The lawsuit alleges Uber used negative option marketing, misled consumers about savings, made cancellation difficult, and charged consumers prematurely. The action seeks restitution, penalties, and an injunction under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act.
The lawsuit seeks restitution for affected consumers, monetary penalties, an injunction to stop the deceptive practices, and costs.
In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing subscription and service agreements, particularly those for membership or loyalty programs like 'Uber One.' Focus on clauses governing free trials and negative option offers, automatic renewal terms, cancellation procedures (including ease of cancellation and any required steps), billing and payment timing representations, and any express or implied promises about cost savings or discounts. Changes may be needed to ensure clear, conspicuous disclosures about automatic charges, simple cancellation mechanisms (e.g., a single-step process), accurate savings calculations, and compliance with specific state and federal laws on online shoppers' confidence and unfair trade practices.
Entity
Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC
Also known as: Uber
Industry
TechnologyOfficial Press Release
https://portal.ct.gov/ag/press-releases/2025-press-releases/attorney-general-tong-sues-uber-over-unfair-and-deceptive-practices
20251215 ftc et al v uber et al first amended complaint reda
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/ag/press_releases/2025/20251215-ftc-et-al-v-uber-et-al-first-amended-complaint-redacted-public.pdf?rev=5a04971b65bf435d8cfbb9c76095dbc8&hash=940EE028DE2A6908A3397CF181AF0C27
Connecticut Attorney General Enforcement Page
https://portal.ct.gov/AG/Privacy/Privacy-Resources
"Uber Technologies, LLC and Uber USA, LLC"
"Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act"
"U.S. Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act"
"Uber improperly used negative option marketing tactics when it offered free trial subscriptions – a practice that automatically charges consumers if they do not cancel a free trial."
"the companies made it extraordinarily difficult to cancel Uber One once enrolled."
$625K
Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.
$2.6M
Connecticut and New York found that Boston Children’s Health Physicians and its security vendor, XTIUM, failed to use reasonable safeguards, resulting in hackers accessing sensitive personal, medical, and employee information. The companies agreed to pay penalties totaling $2.64 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.
Connecticut joined a coalition of state attorneys general filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds. The states seek protections for children and consumers if the company’s business or assets are sold or transferred; the filing does not impose a fine or other remedy.
Attorney General William Tong and Consumer Counsel Claire Coleman petitioned PURA to review how Connecticut public utilities use artificial intelligence, citing potential data privacy and cybersecurity risks, algorithmic errors, and misleading outputs. The petition asks PURA to examine utility AI systems, safeguards, vendors, and data security practices; it does not report a finding of violation or an imposed penalty.
$2.0M
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a settlement with RZ Smoke, Inc. over allegations that it distributed and sold high-potency cannabis products without a state license. The stipulated judgment is $2 million, with $375,000 payable to the State and $1.6 million suspended to ensure compliance; the company is barred from specified cannabis activities in Connecticut unless licensed.
$13.7M
Connecticut joined a coalition of states and the federal government in settling allegations that Takeda paid healthcare providers speaker honoraria and provided meals to induce prescriptions of Trintellix, leading to allegedly false claims to government healthcare programs. Takeda agreed to pay $13,670,921 plus accrued interest, with portions allocated to federal and state programs.