New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
CoalitionLow RiskMultistate

AGs Urge Congress to Reject Ban on State AI Laws

U.S. CongressNovember 25, 2025Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Attorney General William Tong and a bipartisan coalition of 36 attorneys general sent a letter to Congress opposing efforts to ban state AI laws. They argue that state laws are necessary to protect residents from AI harms in the absence of federal protections. The coalition urges Congress to work with them on federal AI protections instead.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review contracts for AI-related clauses to ensure they account for potential state-specific AI regulations. Focus on compliance obligations, indemnity terms for AI harms, and provisions that allow for adjustments due to changing AI laws. Include requirements for vendors to comply with all applicable state AI laws and to provide certifications of AI safety and fairness.

Contract Search Terms

AI regulation compliancestate law applicabilityfederal preemption clauseAI use restrictionsdeepfake prohibitionalgorithmic transparency requirementAI vendor obligationsmultijurisdictional complianceAI risk assessmentchange-in-law provision

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

U.S. Congress

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

American SamoaArizonaCaliforniaDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaKansasLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaTennesseeUtahVermontVirgin IslandsWashingtonWisconsin

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Congress"

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

$625K

Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.

CT

Boston Children’s Health Physicians and XTIUM

$2.6M

Connecticut and New York found that Boston Children’s Health Physicians and its security vendor, XTIUM, failed to use reasonable safeguards, resulting in hackers accessing sensitive personal, medical, and employee information. The companies agreed to pay penalties totaling $2.64 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.

CT

Character Technologies, Inc.

Connecticut joined a coalition of state attorneys general filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds. The states seek protections for children and consumers if the company’s business or assets are sold or transferred; the filing does not impose a fine or other remedy.

CT

Connecticut public utilities

Attorney General William Tong and Consumer Counsel Claire Coleman petitioned PURA to review how Connecticut public utilities use artificial intelligence, citing potential data privacy and cybersecurity risks, algorithmic errors, and misleading outputs. The petition asks PURA to examine utility AI systems, safeguards, vendors, and data security practices; it does not report a finding of violation or an imposed penalty.

CT

RZ Smoke, Inc.

$2.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a settlement with RZ Smoke, Inc. over allegations that it distributed and sold high-potency cannabis products without a state license. The stipulated judgment is $2 million, with $375,000 payable to the State and $1.6 million suspended to ensure compliance; the company is barred from specified cannabis activities in Connecticut unless licensed.

CT

Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc.

$13.7M

Connecticut joined a coalition of states and the federal government in settling allegations that Takeda paid healthcare providers speaker honoraria and provided meals to induce prescriptions of Trintellix, leading to allegedly false claims to government healthcare programs. Takeda agreed to pay $13,670,921 plus accrued interest, with portions allocated to federal and state programs.