Connecticut Attorney General William Tong sued Reynolds Consumer Products for violating the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act by falsely marketing Hefty 'Recycling Bags' as recyclable and suitable for recycling programs, despite knowing they are incompatible with Connecticut's recycling facilities and cause contamination. The lawsuit seeks damages, injunctive relief, and other remedies to stop the deceptive practice.
The lawsuit seeks monetary damages including disgorgement of profits and civil penalties, as well as non-monetary relief such as an injunction to prevent further deceptive marketing, corrective notices to consumers, and requirements to prevent harm to Connecticut's recycling systems.
In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with suppliers of raw materials, customer contracts with retailers (especially those involving private-label or co-branded products), and marketing/licensing agreements where product claims are made. Specific clauses to scrutinize include representations and warranties regarding product recyclability and compatibility with municipal programs, marketing and advertising compliance clauses, indemnification provisions for false or misleading claims, and termination clauses triggered by regulatory action or misrepresentation. Changes may be needed to require substantiation of all environmental claims (e.g., third-party certifications, facility compatibility tests), mandate pre-approval of marketing language, and include audit rights to verify ongoing compliance with stated recyclability attributes.
Entity
Reynolds Consumer Products
Industry
OtherOfficial Press Release
https://portal.ct.gov/ag/press-releases/2022-press-releases/ag-tong-sues-reynolds-over-hefty-recycling-bags
hefty complaint pdf.pdf?rev=e2addf904676477185c9a10d8cc2eff2
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/ag/press_releases/2022/hefty-complaint-pdf.pdf?rev=e2addf904676477185c9a10d8cc2eff2&hash=DE2C2FAD50FB82945593B04F101D37DB
Connecticut Attorney General Enforcement Page
https://portal.ct.gov/AG/Privacy/Privacy-Resources
$625K
Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.
$2.6M
Connecticut and New York found that Boston Children’s Health Physicians and its security vendor, XTIUM, failed to use reasonable safeguards, resulting in hackers accessing sensitive personal, medical, and employee information. The companies agreed to pay penalties totaling $2.64 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.
Connecticut joined a coalition of state attorneys general filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds. The states seek protections for children and consumers if the company’s business or assets are sold or transferred; the filing does not impose a fine or other remedy.
Attorney General William Tong and Consumer Counsel Claire Coleman petitioned PURA to review how Connecticut public utilities use artificial intelligence, citing potential data privacy and cybersecurity risks, algorithmic errors, and misleading outputs. The petition asks PURA to examine utility AI systems, safeguards, vendors, and data security practices; it does not report a finding of violation or an imposed penalty.
$2.0M
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a settlement with RZ Smoke, Inc. over allegations that it distributed and sold high-potency cannabis products without a state license. The stipulated judgment is $2 million, with $375,000 payable to the State and $1.6 million suspended to ensure compliance; the company is barred from specified cannabis activities in Connecticut unless licensed.
$13.7M
Connecticut joined a coalition of states and the federal government in settling allegations that Takeda paid healthcare providers speaker honoraria and provided meals to induce prescriptions of Trintellix, leading to allegedly false claims to government healthcare programs. Takeda agreed to pay $13,670,921 plus accrued interest, with portions allocated to federal and state programs.