New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Administrative OrderLow Risk

CT AG Tong Opposes PURA's Aquarion Sale Over Rate Hike Concerns

Aquarion CompanyMarch 6, 2026Connecticut Attorney General

Consumers Affected

722,000

Summary

PURA preliminarily approved the sale of Aquarion Water Company to a new nonprofit Aquarion Water Authority, expected to double water rates. Attorney General Tong opposes the decision, citing loss of public oversight and high costs to consumers. The conversion removes PURA regulation, placing rate approvals under a board with no history of rejecting hikes.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review contracts with water utilities or related service agreements for clauses on rate adjustments, regulatory approvals, and governance changes. Specifically, check for provisions allowing rate increases, requirements for board or regulatory approvals, and terms affected by ownership changes or conversion to nonprofit status, as these may impact consumer costs and oversight.

Contract Search Terms

rate adjustment clauseregulatory approval requirementutility board approvalconsumer rate protectionnonprofit conversionpublic oversight mechanismwater utility service agreementPURA jurisdiction clauserate hike provisionmunicipal water authority contract

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Aquarion Company

Also known as: Aquarion

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Event Date
"03/06/2026"
Entity Name
"Aquarion Company"
Consumers Affected
"serving approximately 722,000 people"

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

Frontier Communications Parent Inc.

$625K

Connecticut reached a $625,000 settlement with Frontier Communications Parent Inc. over an April 2024 breach in which compromised employee and vendor credentials were used to access internal systems and exfiltrate unencrypted personal information of 58,841 Connecticut residents. The settlement requires Frontier to strengthen its security program, implement specific safeguards and training, and obtain an independent third-party assessment.

CT

Boston Children’s Health Physicians and XTIUM

$2.6M

Connecticut and New York found that Boston Children’s Health Physicians and its security vendor, XTIUM, failed to use reasonable safeguards, resulting in hackers accessing sensitive personal, medical, and employee information. The companies agreed to pay penalties totaling $2.64 million and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures.

CT

Character Technologies, Inc.

Connecticut joined a coalition of state attorneys general filing a notice in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy proceedings, raising concerns about the company’s safety and privacy practices and the sensitive information it holds. The states seek protections for children and consumers if the company’s business or assets are sold or transferred; the filing does not impose a fine or other remedy.

CT

Connecticut public utilities

Attorney General William Tong and Consumer Counsel Claire Coleman petitioned PURA to review how Connecticut public utilities use artificial intelligence, citing potential data privacy and cybersecurity risks, algorithmic errors, and misleading outputs. The petition asks PURA to examine utility AI systems, safeguards, vendors, and data security practices; it does not report a finding of violation or an imposed penalty.

CT

RZ Smoke, Inc.

$2.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a settlement with RZ Smoke, Inc. over allegations that it distributed and sold high-potency cannabis products without a state license. The stipulated judgment is $2 million, with $375,000 payable to the State and $1.6 million suspended to ensure compliance; the company is barred from specified cannabis activities in Connecticut unless licensed.

CT

Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc.

$13.7M

Connecticut joined a coalition of states and the federal government in settling allegations that Takeda paid healthcare providers speaker honoraria and provided meals to induce prescriptions of Trintellix, leading to allegedly false claims to government healthcare programs. Takeda agreed to pay $13,670,921 plus accrued interest, with portions allocated to federal and state programs.