New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules

Privacy Enforcement Tracker

1,711 enforcement actions from 16 federal and state jurisdictions. Every event traced back to its official government source.

1,711

Total Actions

16

Jurisdictions

$51.3B+

Total Fines Tracked

Access this data programmatically:MCP Server API Docs
NYCoalitionMultistate

Character Technologies, Inc.

New York Attorney General Letitia James and a bipartisan coalition of 39 other attorneys general filed a motion in Character Technologies, Inc.’s bankruptcy, citing risks to children and sensitive user information and potential violations of state privacy laws. The coalition asks the court, the company, and any prospective buyer to require meaningful privacy and safety protections; no fine or final remedy is reported.

LowChildren's DataHealth DataConsent Failure
NYEnforcement Action

3M Company

New York Attorney General Letitia James sued 3M, DuPont, and other chemical companies for knowingly causing decades of PFAS pollution through consumer products. The lawsuit alleges the companies hid toxicity risks, failed to warn the public, and seeks cleanup funding, damages, and injunctive relief.

LowNotice FailureConsent FailureHealth Data
NYSettlement

Wojeski & Company

New York Attorney General Letitia James settled with public accounting firm Wojeski & Company over two data breaches in 2023 and 2024 that exposed personal information of over 4,700 New York residents, including social security numbers and medical benefits. The firm failed to implement adequate data security measures, did not encrypt sensitive data, and delayed notifying affected consumers of the breaches for over a year. Wojeski must pay $60,000 in penalties and implement enhanced cybersecurity measures including encryption, incident response plans, and employee training.

LowData BreachSecurity FailureBreach Notification Delay

$60K

NYEnforcement ActionMultistate

23andMe, Inc.(23andMe)

New York Attorney General Letitia James, joined by 27 other state attorneys general and the District of Columbia, filed a lawsuit against 23andMe to block the company’s planned sale of 15 million customers’ genetic and health data without their consent or knowledge. The coalition argues 23andMe must comply with state laws requiring express informed consent for the sale or transfer of sensitive genetic data. The lawsuit seeks to prevent misuse, exposure in future breaches, and unauthorized use of customers’ private genetic information.

LowConsent FailureHealth DataUnauthorized Data Sharing

Explore Enforcement Data