New: a trial court in 1 of every 10 U.S. counties. Read the post
Court Rules
Judge

Judge Erik Thorson

Individual Rules, Standing Orders & Policies

Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County

Limits & Logistics

Document Limits

Joint Statement
3 pgs

Communication

Email

Chambers

jaime.ferniza@jbazmc.maricopa.gov
Scheduling
Email

Chambers

sebastian.inman@jbazmc.maricopa.gov
Scheduling
Email

Chambers

SchedulingEmergencies
Filters:

Page & Word Limits1 rule

Page LimitsImportant

If counsel or self-represented parties believe a brief, on-the-record conference with the Court will resolve the issue posed by a discovery or disclosure motion yet to be filed, they may instead file a joint, three-page statement (with each side being entitled to 1.5 pages) and request a discovery dispute conference with the Court.

Joint statement
Up to 3 pages per side
Maricopa:7eebed0997410bfb4e3f755e
|SectionDiscovery or Disclosure Disputes and/or Sanctions

Document Filing Requirements3 rules

Filing RequirementsMandatory

Proposed orders of any kind should be lodged in eFile as separate Word documents related to the filing they accompany; there is no need to include the word "Proposed" on the Word-format order.

Maricopa:7eebed0997410bfb4e3f755e
|SectionSpecific Requirements or Preferences
Filing RequirementsMandatory

The joint statement must include a Rule 9(c) good-faith consultation certificate and may include any attachments the counsel or parties believe are necessary for the Court to resolve the dispute.

Document
Joint statement

Must include

  • Certificate of conference
Maricopa:7eebed0997410bfb4e3f755e
|SectionDiscovery or Disclosure Disputes and/or Sanctions
Filing RequirementsImportant

Motions should be accompanied by a lodged Word-format electronic form of order, without the words “Proposed” or “[Proposed].”

Court's wording

Division 46 can handle most motions via eFile; please lodge a Word format electronic form of order. There is no need to include the word "Proposed" or "[Proposed]" on Word format forms of order; omitting it makes e-filing more efficient for the Division.

Maricopa:7eebed0997410bfb4e3f755e
|SectionMotion Practice

Filing & Service rules

Electronic Filing Rules

Proposed orders must be lodged in eFile as separate Word-format documents related to the filing they accompany.

Proposed orders of any kind should be lodged in eFile as separate Word documents related to the filing they accompany; there is no need to include the word "Proposed" on the Word-format order.

Page 1 | Specific Requirements or Preferences

All exhibits must be submitted through the CaseCenter electronic exhibit portal.

Judge Thorson's Division is also one of those using CaseCenter, a state-wide electronic exhibit portal. All exhibits must be submitted through CaseCenter.

Page 1 | Specific Requirements or Preferences

Most motions may be handled via eFile, and a Word-format electronic form of order should be lodged; the form need not include “Proposed” or “[Proposed].”

Division 46 can handle most motions via eFile; please lodge a Word format electronic form of order. There is no need to include the word "Proposed" or "[Proposed]" on Word format forms of order; omitting it makes e-filing more efficient for the Division.

Page 1 | Motion Practice

Courtesy Copy Requirements

Judge Thorson does not require courtesy hard copies of any e-filed item, unless you are submitting deposition designations. Only then are paper copies of designated deposition transcripts with objection and response charts/annotations helpful. If you only filed your document in hard copy, please do provide a courtesy copy to the Division, as otherwise we do not get notice of it.

Judge Thorson does not require courtesy hard copies of any e-filed item, unless you are submitting deposition designations. Only then are paper copies of designated deposition transcripts with objection and response charts/annotations helpful. If you only filed your document in hard copy, please do provide a courtesy copy to the Division, as otherwise we do not get notice of it.

Page 1 | Specific Requirements or Preferences

Pre-Motion Conference Requirements

Before filing a discovery or disclosure motion, parties must comply with the required good-faith consultation rules; personal meeting or contact is not required when the stated domestic-violence and self-representation conditions apply.

This Division requires strict compliance with Ariz. R. Fam. L.P. 51(f) and 9(c), regarding good-faith consultation before filing a discovery or disclosure motion. Ariz. R. Fam. L.P. 9(c)(2) has an exception, however: The parties are not required to personally meet or contact each other if: (A) there is a current court order prohibiting contact between the parties, a history of domestic violence between the parties, or an allegation of domestic violence; and (B) the alleged victim of the domestic violence is self-represented.

Page 1 | Discovery or Disclosure Disputes and/or Sanctions

The expedited dispute-resolution procedure applies only to discovery or disclosure issues unless a party seeks leave to use it for other issues.

This expedited dispute resolution procedure is applicable to discovery or disclosure issues only, unless leave of Court is sought to apply it to other issues in a case.

Page 1 | Discovery or Disclosure Disputes and/or Sanctions

Adjournment & Extension Requirements

When the parties agree to a brief extension of a response, reply, or other pretrial deadline, email Division 46 staff, copy all counsel and self-represented parties, and advise them of the agreement and any related requests to the Court.

If agreement on a brief extension of a response or reply or other pretrial deadline is reached, please email, copying all counsel and self-represented parties, Division 46 staff (Jaime.Ferniza@jbazmc.maricopa.gov and Sebastian.Inman@jbazmc.maricopa.gov) to advise of that and make any related requests of the Court.

Page 1 | Motion Practice

Chambers Communication Rules

Requests to appear in person in a presumptively remote proceeding must be emailed to Division staff at least seven days beforehand, copying counsel and self-represented parties; untimely requests may be summarily denied.

If you intend to request to appear in-person for what is a presumptively remote proceeding, please make such request via email to Division staff, copying all counsel and any self-represented parties, at least seven days in advance of the proceeding. Requests to appear in-person for remote proceedings submitted untimely are subject to summary denial.

Page 1 | Specific Requirements or Preferences

Emails to the Division about a pending case must copy all other parties or counsel, and the Division will not engage in ex parte communications; the stated email-copy direction excludes requests for temporary orders without notice.

If you use any Division email address to communicate about a case pending before Judge Thorson, please copy all other parties or their counsel on the email. This especially includes communications about emergency filings (OTHER than temporary orders being sought without notice; for those, filers should follow Rule 48(b), Ariz. R. Fam. L.P.). The Division will not engage in ex parte communications and can assess emergency filings (again, other than temporary orders being sought without notice) much faster if the other side is included on email communication, and even better, if the other side's position has been sought in advance and is also included.

Page 1 | Specific Requirements or Preferences

If agreement on a brief extension of a response or reply or other pretrial deadline is reached, please email, copying all counsel and self-represented parties, Division 46 staff (Jaime.Ferniza@jbazmc.maricopa.gov and Sebastian.Inman@jbazmc.maricopa.gov) to advise of that and make any related requests of the Court.

If agreement on a brief extension of a response or reply or other pretrial deadline is reached, please email, copying all counsel and self-represented parties, Division 46 staff (Jaime.Ferniza@jbazmc.maricopa.gov and Sebastian.Inman@jbazmc.maricopa.gov) to advise of that and make any related requests of the Court.

Page 1 | Motion Practice

About Judge Erik Thorson

Judge Erik Thorson is a judge on the Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County, the state's trial court of general jurisdiction for Maricopa County. The court handles civil, criminal, family, and other matters within its general jurisdiction.

The only published document is a profile page; no specific procedures are listed. Practitioners should refer to the court's general rules.

Common questions about Judge Erik Thorson's rules

Are courtesy copies required for Judge Erik Thorson?

Judge Thorson does not require courtesy hard copies of any e-filed item, unless you are submitting deposition designations. Only then are paper copies of designated deposition transcripts with objection and response charts/annotations helpful. If you only filed your document in hard copy, please do provide a courtesy copy to the Division, as otherwise we do not get notice of it.

View ruleSource: page 1, section Specific Requirements or Preferences

Does Judge Erik Thorson require a pre-motion conference or letter before filing a motion?

Before filing a discovery or disclosure motion, parties must comply with the required good-faith consultation rules; personal meeting or contact is not required when the stated domestic-violence and self-representation conditions apply.

View ruleSource: page 1, section Discovery or Disclosure Disputes and/or Sanctions

What page or word limits apply to joint statement before Judge Erik Thorson?

Judge Erik Thorson's rule states these limits: 3 pages. Instead of filing a discovery or disclosure motion, parties who believe a brief court conference may resolve the issue may file a joint statement of up to three pages, with 1.5 pages for each side, and request a discovery dispute conference.

View ruleSource: page 1, section Discovery or Disclosure Disputes and/or Sanctions

What must be included with proposed order filings before Judge Erik Thorson?

Lodge proposed orders in eFile as separate Word documents linked to the filing they accompany; the order need not include the word “Proposed.”

View ruleSource: page 1, section Specific Requirements or Preferences

What must be included with joint statement filings before Judge Erik Thorson?

The rule requires certificate of conference. The joint statement must include a Rule 9(c) good-faith consultation certificate and may include attachments needed to resolve the dispute.

View ruleSource: page 1, section Discovery or Disclosure Disputes and/or Sanctions

How may parties contact Judge Erik Thorson's chambers?

Requests to appear in person in a presumptively remote proceeding must be emailed to Division staff at least seven days beforehand, copying counsel and self-represented parties; untimely requests may be summarily denied.

View ruleSource: page 1, section Specific Requirements or Preferences

How do I request an adjournment or extension before Judge Erik Thorson?

When the parties agree to a brief extension of a response, reply, or other pretrial deadline, email Division 46 staff, copy all counsel and self-represented parties, and advise them of the agreement and any related requests to the Court.

View ruleSource: page 1, section Motion Practice

Is electronic filing required before Judge Erik Thorson?

Yes. Electronic filing is required for the covered filings. All exhibits must be submitted through the CaseCenter electronic exhibit portal.

View ruleSource: page 1, section Specific Requirements or Preferences
Complete rules summary for Judge Erik Thorson

Requests to appear in person in a presumptively remote proceeding must be emailed to Division staff at least seven days beforehand, copying counsel and self-represented parties; untimely requests may be summarily denied.

Emails to the Division about a pending case must copy all other parties or counsel, and the Division will not engage in ex parte communications; the stated email-copy direction excludes requests for temporary orders without notice.

All exhibits must be submitted through the CaseCenter electronic exhibit portal.

Lodge proposed orders in eFile as separate Word documents linked to the filing they accompany; the order need not include the word “Proposed.”

Proposed orders must be lodged in eFile as separate Word-format documents related to the filing they accompany.

Most motions may be handled via eFile, and a Word-format electronic form of order should be lodged; the form need not include “Proposed” or “[Proposed].”

Motions should be accompanied by a lodged Word-format electronic form of order, without the words “Proposed” or “[Proposed].”

When the parties agree to a brief extension of a response, reply, or other pretrial deadline, email Division 46 staff, copy all counsel and self-represented parties, and advise them of the agreement and any related requests to the Court.

Before filing a discovery or disclosure motion, parties must comply with the required good-faith consultation rules; personal meeting or contact is not required when the stated domestic-violence and self-representation conditions apply.

Instead of filing a discovery or disclosure motion, parties who believe a brief court conference may resolve the issue may file a joint statement of up to three pages, with 1.5 pages for each side, and request a discovery dispute conference.

The joint statement must include a Rule 9(c) good-faith consultation certificate and may include attachments needed to resolve the dispute.

The expedited dispute-resolution procedure applies only to discovery or disclosure issues unless a party seeks leave to use it for other issues.

Judge Thorson does not require courtesy hard copies of any e-filed item, unless you are submitting deposition designations. Only then are paper copies of designated deposition transcripts with objection and response charts/annotations helpful. If you only filed your document in hard copy, please do provide a courtesy copy to the Division, as otherwise we do not get notice of it.

If agreement on a brief extension of a response or reply or other pretrial deadline is reached, please email, copying all counsel and self-represented parties, Division 46 staff (Jaime.Ferniza@jbazmc.maricopa.gov and Sebastian.Inman@jbazmc.maricopa.gov) to advise of that and make any related requests of the Court.

More Judges in Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County

Adam Driggs
Judge
Addison Owen
Judge
Adele Ponce
Judge
Amanda Parker
Judge
Amy Kalman
Judge
Andrew Russell
Judge
Annielaurie van Wie
Judge
Aryeh D. Schwartz
Judge